The Southern Literary Review, southern authors, reviews of southern books, and bookstore for southern culture.  Southern authors including Flannery O'Connor, Barbara Kingsolver, and Tom Wolfe.

home
about us
links
search
newsletter
 

Southern Lit Review -- your source for the finest southern literature from the most talented southern authors.
 
Search Now:


Oxford American -- southern culture and criticism from the best southern authors from Wendell Berry to Alice Walker!
A premier source for southern literature.

 



 


Father of Southern Literature

 


Southern
Elegance & Style

 


[return to top]
[southern authors]
[southern books]
[southern states]
[site map]

copyright 2004
j.c. robertson

AuthorsBookstoreReviewsStates

 Joe: A Novel
by Larry Brown

Reviewed by M. Dale Jones

In 1991, after his masterful collection of stark, humorous, and fiercest stories, Big Bad Love, Larry Brown released his second novel, Joe: A Novel.  More so than his first novel (Dirty Work), Joe brought together the great themes and the rich environment that would typify this work: The struggle with poverty or barely making your way from job to job; the struggle between decency and outright evil; and, the inner struggle to resist the forces to implode in furies of self-destruction. 

In Joe, Brown has fully formed his unique lyrical and spare voice and has breathed life into characters that are so real the reader leaves the novel with the impression that they have met Joe Ransom, Gary Jones and know low-down dogs like Wade Jones, Gary’s father.  We recognize in Wade, like Faulkner’s Anse Bundren, the father-figure whose whole being is bent on an entirely selfish objective that is typically achieved through the exploitation and destruction of their children.  Whether after teeth, a wife, alcohol, or money, the unsuppressed desire of the father sets both Faulkner’s and Brown’s novel into action. 

We are first introduced to the chronically homeless and fleeing Jones family, Wade, Mama, Fay, Gary, and Dorothy wondering from Oklahoma to Florida back to Mississippi through highways and country by-roads in sojourn to an old familiar place that Wade remembers from his younger years.  As his family suffers from excruciating depravation, Wade’s unchallenged desire for alcohol is pathetically apparent. As they walk the highway, Wade finds a couple unopened can of Budweiser and joyfully/miserly hogs them to himself.   The chapter ends with the industrious Gary finding an abandoned house/cabin that quickly becomes the residence of the Wade Jones Family.

In the next chapter, we are introduced to the Joe Ransom, a forty something ex-convict whose job entails poisoning trees (clearing the land) for a lumber company. Joe’s wife left him after years of living with his gambling, drinking, and carousing. He has got a couple of children whom he rarely sees; drives a broken down truck; keeps a pit bull to guard his house; has a girlfriend, Connie, roughly the age of his own daughter; and has an ongoing feud with several of the degenerate locals (chiefly Willie Russell).  His independent mentality of self-reliance and suspicions of the local authorities comes through as an ‘authority complex’ that repeatedly threatens to have him return to prison.  But, his outlook also promises the hope of redemption because of his awareness of his limitation, faults and sense of right or order.

The intersection of Joe and Gary forms the stories central understanding of the relentlessness of evil and the hope of redemption in sacrificial caring for another person.  In between Wade steals, connives, and even kills as he embarks on a perpetual quest for another jug of liquor and a pack of smokes. He dominates by terror the entire Jones family with such violence that the eighteen-year-old daughter, Fay, flees the house and family to seek a life (Fay: A Novel). Gary stays with his Mama and Dorothy out of a sense of misguided loyalty.  Though he cannot read or write, Gary becomes the primary wage earner in the family and begins working for Joe poisoning trees in the woods.  A bond in formed between Gary and Joe, between a form of innocence and a dreaming or longing for innocence in the form of making things right by doing something really right for someone unable to save themselves; redemption. 

As the novel draws to the showdown between Wade and his radical exploitation of everyone, particularly his family, to satisfy his basest desires and Joe’s vicarious salvation through his ennobled protection of Gary, the world of moral ambiguity is quickened and solidified against the violence against innocence.   Joe’s sense of what is right and what must happen propels him found with the power and justification of a ‘fated’ act.  He acts not from a place of puritanical moral purity, but from the grayness of his own moral compass that allows for complete clarity as he sees the lives of Gary and Dorothy threatened with a violence of grotesques magnitude.

Joe ends as it began.  Nothing is resolved.  No one has escaped the pain of life or even the pain inflicted by individuals bent on their own desires without consideration or care for those around.  Wade, a master of the art of using people as a means toward his own end, poisons people at their roots or base so that he can control them in their weakness.  Like the poisoned trees, everyone has been damaged and will not stand long.  Fay has fled, Gary returns to his Mama with a traumatized Dorothy, and Gary is left to settle matters in violence.  All that is innocent is damaged.  All that is free is bound.  All that is withheld is taken by force, violated and destroyed.

Larry Brown’s Joe stands at the beginning of his amazing and too brief career as a gateway to the moral complexity and flawed realism of the world we inhabit.  No one’s motives are pure. No act is without self-service or self-gain.  Even Joe’s sacrifice is framed within the larger context of a countdown to his return to prison due to his anti-authoritarian mentality.  One knows, doesn’t one, that Joe was going, eventually, back to prison.  Yet, his decision ennobles and redeems him nevertheless.  Brown reaches for no easy solutions or convenient resolutions.  Joe’s painful realism, which depicts characters as flawed, struggling agents of their own lives, disallows anything but authenticity and integrity in understanding actions and consequences.  We are the wiser who benefit from Brown’s deeply philosophical novel whose moral complexity reads like a Camus of the American South.

 

 


~

~

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Community Coffee - Taste the Difference